优质护理干预在雾化吸入治疗小儿哮喘中的效果

李喜绒

（陕西省西安市户县妇幼保健院，陕西 西安，710300）

浏览次数：62次 下载次数：473次

摘要：

目的 探讨优质护理干预对雾化吸入布地奈德治疗小儿哮喘急性发作的效果。方法 选择我院2015年8月至2016年12月收治的80例哮喘急性期患儿为研究对象，随机分为研究组（n=40）与对照组（n=40），对照组实施常规护理措施， 研究组在常规护理基础上行优质护理干预。比较两组患儿治疗效果、家属对护理工作满意度和临床症状消失时间。结果 研 究组治疗总有效率为92.5%，明显高于对照组的70.0%，差异显著（P<0.05）；研究组患儿家属护理满意度高于对照组（P< 0.05）；两组患儿呼吸困难、咳嗽、喘息、喘鸣音消失时间均存在显著差异（P<0.05）。结论 雾化吸入治疗能有效减轻儿童哮喘急性症状，同时配合优质护理干预，能有效提升临床治疗效果和家属对护理工作的满意度，是一种值得在临床上推广应用的 方案。

关键词：雾化吸入；小儿哮喘；优质护理干预

中图分类号：R473.72文献标志码：A文章编号：2096-1413(2017)35-0152-02

Clinical effect of high quality nursing intervention in asthma children treated with atomization inhalation
LI Xi-rong
(Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Hu County in Xi``an, Xi``an 710300, China)

ABSTRACT: Objective To investigate the effect of high quality nursing intervention in children with acute asthma treated with atomization inhalation of budesonide. Methods Eighty children with acute asthma in our hospital from August 2015 to December 2016 were randomly divided into study group (40 cases) and control group (40 cases), the control group was treated with routine nursing measures, the study group was given high quality nursing service on the basis of routine nursing. The therapeutic effects, family``s nursing satisfaction and disappearance time of clinical symptoms of the two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate of the study group was 92.5%, which was significantly higher than 70.0% of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); the family``s nursing satisfaction in the study group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05); there were significant differences in the disappearance time of wheeze, cough, pant and dyspnea between the two groups (P<0.05). Conclusion Atomization inhalation treatment can effectively release the acute asthma symptoms of children, and equipped with high quality nursing service can effectively improve the clinical treatment effect and family``s satisfaction of nursing work, which is worthy of clinical application.
KEYWORDS: atomization inhalation; asthma in children; high quality nursing intervention

参考文献：
[1] 于茁.雾化吸入治疗小儿哮喘急性发作的临床观察及护理干预[J]. 实用临床医药杂志,2016,20(2):122-124.
[2] 梁爱玲,伍云锋,杨丽霞,等.布地奈德混悬液联合复方异丙托溴铵 雾化吸入治疗小儿哮喘的疗效及护理[J].深圳中西医结合杂志,2016,26(6):166-167.
[3] 邹艳萍,罗小兰,刘利,等.布地奈德与丙酸倍氯米松辅助特布他林 雾化吸入治疗小儿哮喘急性发作的对比研究[J].中国药房,2016,27(17):2388-2391.
[4] 张科云.沙丁胺醇联合布地奈德治疗小儿哮喘急性发作的疗效及 改善肺功能的作用[J].临床医学研究与实践,2017,2(5):39,41.
[5] 陈小珍,叶军.氧驱雾化吸入布地奈德混悬液在小儿支气管哮喘急 性发作期的应用[J].实用药物与临床,2014,17(3):317-319.
[6] 蒋红宇,邱根祥,宋海萍,等.氧驱雾化吸入普米克令舒治疗小儿哮 喘急性发作疗效及对肺功能的影响[J].实用药物与临床,2014,17(1):103-105.
[7] 梁忠伟.不同雾化吸入方式治疗小儿哮喘临床效果评价[J].临床医 学研究与实践,2016,1(16):86.
[8] 耿立建.不同剂量布地奈德混悬液雾化吸入治疗小儿哮喘急性发 作疗效比较[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2013,22(32):3601-3602.