中国学术期刊网络出版总库入编期刊
CNKI中文期刊全文数据库全文收录期刊
中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库全文收录期刊
万方数据——数字化期刊群收录期刊
中文科技期刊数据库全文收录期刊

主管:陕西省卫生健康委员会
主办:西安心身医学研究所
   西安交通大学第一附属医院
国际标准刊号:ISSN2096—1413
国内统一刊号:CN61—1503/R

腹腔镜与开腹手术在胃穿孔修补术中的疗效分析

郑宏乾

(陕西省平利县中医院,陕西 安康,725500)

浏览次数:57次 下载次数:296次

摘要:

目的 分析腹腔镜与开腹手术在胃穿孔修补术中的疗效。方法 选取来本院就诊的60例胃穿孔修补手术患者,按照手术方式将其分为腹腔镜组和开腹组,每组30例,分别采用腹腔镜手术和开腹手术。观察两组患者的术中、术后情况及并发症发生情况。结果 两组患者的手术时间比较,无明显差异(P>0.05);腹腔镜组患者术中出血量明显低于开腹组患者,下床活动时间、胃肠功能恢复时间及住院时间明显短于开腹组患者(P<0.05)。腹腔镜组患者的感染、穿孔复发及腹腔囊张发生率均明显低于开腹组(P<0.05)。结论 腹腔镜手术在胃穿孔修补术中的创伤面积明显小于开腹手术方式,且出血量少,术后并发症少,具有极高的推广价值。

关键词:腹腔镜;开腹手术;胃穿孔修补术

中图分类号:R656.6 文献标志码:A文章编号:2096-1413(2017)16-0088-02

    Analysis of the effect of laparoscopic and open surgery in gastric perforation repair
    ZHENG Hong-qian
    (Pingli County Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Ankang 725500, China)

    ABSTRACT: Objective To analyze the effect of laparoscopic and open surgery in the treatment of gastric perforation repair. Methods Sixty cases of patients with gastric perforation repair in our hospital were selected and divided into laparoscopic group and laparotomy group according to the surgery method, with 30 cases in each group, and received laparoscopic surgery and laparotomy respectively. The operation, postoperative situation and complications were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in the operation time of the two groups (P>0.05); the intraoperative blood loss of the laparoscopic group was significantly lower than that of the laparotomy group, the time of getting out of bed, gastrointestinal function recovery and hospitalization of the laparoscopic group were significantly shorter than those of the laparotomy group (P<0.05). The incidence of infection, abdominal cavity and recurrence of gastric perforation of the laparoscopic group were significantly lower than those of the laparotomy group (P<0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery has smaller traumatic area in the treatment of gastric perforation repair than laparotomy surgery, lower intraoperative blood loss and less postoperative complications, which has a very high promotion value.
    KEYWORDS: laparoscopy surgery; laparotomy surgery; gastric perforation repair

    参考文献:
    [1] CHOUSLEB E,SZOMSTEIN S,LOMENZO E,et al.Laparoscopic removal of gastric band after early gastric erosion: case report and review of the literature[J].Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech,2005,15(1):24-27.
    [2] 邱斌.腹腔镜与开腹手术下行胃穿孔修补术的综合临床疗效对比 [J].中国保健营养,2013,19(3):1178-1179.
    [3] 梁文彬.腹腔镜与开腹手术下行胃穿孔修补术的综合疗效对比[J].医学信息,2013,26(2):184.
    [4] 姜涛,张少成,高海冰,等.经腹腔镜行胃穿孔修补术治疗急性胃穿孔患者临床效果分析[J].临床研究,2016,24(4):39-40.
    [5] 徐靖平.腹腔镜与开腹手术下行胃穿孔修补术的综合临床疗效对比[J].中国社区医师,2014,30(32):19-20.
    [6] 黄素.腹腔镜胃穿孔修补术与开腹手术后患者康复情况的临床比较研究[J].医学信息,2014,27(22):82-83.
    [7] 陆俊国.腹腔镜与开腹手术下行胃穿孔修补术的综合疗效对比[J].健康必读(中旬刊),2013,12(4):227.
    [8] 孙斌.腹腔镜与开腹手术下行胃穿孔修补术的综合临床疗效对比[J].中国实用医刊,2015,42(9):28-29.
    [9] 陈文,吴雄辉,黄锦远.腹腔镜下与开腹手术行胃穿孔修补术的综合疗效对比分析[J].中国医药科学,2015,5(16):119-121.
    [10] 赵煜.腹腔镜胃穿孔修补术患者围术期胃肠激素及应激指标的变化研究[J].中外医疗,2013,20(35):1-2.

上一篇标准大骨瓣减压术与常规去骨瓣减压术治疗重型颅脑损伤的效果比较

下一篇PHILOS内固定治疗老年肱骨近端骨折临床观察