中国学术期刊网络出版总库入编期刊
CNKI中文期刊全文数据库全文收录期刊
中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库全文收录期刊
万方数据——数字化期刊群收录期刊
中文科技期刊数据库全文收录期刊

主管:陕西省卫生健康委员会
主办:西安心身医学研究所
   西安交通大学第一附属医院
国际标准刊号:ISSN2096—1413
国内统一刊号:CN61—1503/R

标准大骨瓣减压术与常规去骨瓣减压术治疗重型颅脑损伤的效果比较

李健康

(西乡县人民医院,陕西 汉中,723500)

浏览次数:69次 下载次数:264次

摘要:

目的 探讨标准大骨瓣减压术与常规去骨瓣减压术治疗重型颅脑损伤的优缺点,寻找最佳手术方法以提高重型颅脑损伤患者的生存率。方法 选取我院实行开颅减压术的重型颅脑损伤患者69 例,按照治疗方法分为试验组(n=35)和对照组(n= 34),试验组患者行标准大骨瓣减压术,对照组患者行常规去骨瓣开颅术。比较两组患者的治疗效果及并发症发生情况。结果 试验组评估总有效率为80.00%,高于对照组的52.94%(P<0.05);试验组的并发症总发生率为20.00%,与对照组的29.41% 比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 标准大骨瓣减压术可明显提高重型颅脑损伤患者的术后生存率,减少术后并发症的发生,提高患者的生存质量,减轻患者家庭的负担,值得临床推广。

关键词:标准大骨瓣减压术;常规去骨瓣减压术;生存率

中图分类号:R651.1文献标志码:A文章编号:2096-1413(2017)16-0086-02

    Effects of standard large trauma craniotomy and conventional decompressive craniectomy on severe craniocerebral injury
    LI Jian-kang
    (People`s Hospital of Xixiang County, Hanzhong 723500, China)

    ABSTRACT: Objective To explore the advantages and disadvantages of standard large trauma craniotomy and conventional decompressive craniectomy on severe craniocerebral injury, and find the best surgical approach to improve the survival rate of patients with severe craniocerebral trauma. Methods Sixty-nine patients with severe craniocerebral trauma underwent craniotomy were selected and divided into experimental group (n=35) and control group (n=34), the experimental group was treated with standard large trauma craniotomy, and the control group was treated with conventional decompressive craniectomy, the treatment effects and complications were compared in the two groups. Results The total effective rate was 80.00% in the experimental group, which was higher than 52.94% of the control group (P<0.05). The total complication rate was 20.00% in the experimental group and 29.40% in the control group, the difference was not statistically significant in the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Standard large trauma craniotomy can significantly improve the postoperative survival rate of patients with severe craniocerebral injury, it can reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, improve patients` quality of life and reduce the burden on patients, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

    KEYWORDS: standard large trauma craniotomy; conventional decompressive craniectomy; survival rate

    参考文献:
    [1] 王忠诚.神经外科学[M].武汉:湖北科学技术出版社,2005.
    [2] BECKER DP,MILLER JD,WARD JD,et al.The outcome from severe head injury with early diagnosis and intensive management[J].J Neurosurg,1977,47(4):491-502.
    [3] 江基尧.介绍一种美国临床常用的标准外伤大骨瓣开颅术[J].中华神经外科杂志,1998,14(6):273-274.
    [4] 孙华北.标准大骨瓣减压与常规骨瓣减压治疗重型颅脑损伤的临床效果对比[J].中国当代医药,2010,17(28):17-18.
    [5] 刘福荣.重型颅脑损伤52例外科治疗体会[J].陕西医学杂志,2012,41(6):709-710.

上一篇不同术式对急性胃穿孔患者术后胃肠动力、围术期血浆炎性和氧化应激状态的影响

下一篇腹腔镜与开腹手术在胃穿孔修补术中的疗效分析