中国学术期刊网络出版总库入编期刊
CNKI中文期刊全文数据库全文收录期刊
中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库全文收录期刊
万方数据——数字化期刊群收录期刊
中文科技期刊数据库全文收录期刊

主管:陕西省卫生健康委员会
主办:西安心身医学研究所
   西安交通大学第一附属医院
国际标准刊号:ISSN2096—1413
国内统一刊号:CN61—1503/R

手术内固定治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效

蔚青松

(陕西省陇县中医医院,陕西 宝鸡,721200)

浏览次数:102次 下载次数:425次

摘要:

目的 探究股骨粗隆间骨折采用手术内固定治疗的临床疗效。方法 选择我院2010年2月至2015年12月收治的股骨粗隆间骨折的152例患者,根据治疗方法的不同将其分为非手术组与手术组,各76例。非手术组采用骨牵引疗法,手术组采用内固定治疗,包括DHS,Gamma钉、PFN等,对两组患者的临床治疗效果及并发症进行对比与分析。结果 手术组的总有效率为93.42%,明显高于非手术组的71.05%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);手术组的并发症发生率为3.95%,非手术组为 6.58%,两组比较,差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 采用内固定手术治疗,可取得良好的治疗效果,值得临床推广。

关键词:股骨粗隆间骨折;内固定手术;骨牵引疗法

中图分类号:R687.3文献标志码:A文章编号:2096-1413(2017)11-0073-02

    The clinical effect of internal fixation in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture
    YU Qing-song
    (Chinese Medicine Hospital of Long County, Baoji 721200, China)

    ABSTRACT: Objective To investigate the clinical effect of internal fixation in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture. Methods One hundred and fifty-two cases of patients with intertrochanteric fracture in our hospital from February 2010 to December 2015 were selected, which were divided into non operation group and operation group according to the different treatment methods, with 76 cases in each group. The non operative group was treated with bone traction therapy, while the operation group was treated with internal fixation, including DHS, Gamma nail, PFN and so on. The clinical effect and complications of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results The total effective rate of the operation group was 93.42%, which was significantly higher than 71.05% of the non operation group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of complications of the operation group was 3.95%, while the non operation group was 6.58%, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion The internal fixation can achieve a good therapeutic effect,which is worthy of clinical popularization.
    KEYWORDS: intertrochanteric fracture; internal fixation; bone traction therapy

    参考文献:
    [1] 赵洪普,徐秋玉,吕玉明.三种内固定方法治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2012,27(6):500.
    [2] 唐国军,于继刚.三种内固定方法治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的效果对比研究[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2011,33(8):749-752.
    [3] 谢国平,鲁海,魏凌锋,等.不同方法治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效比较[J].中国老年学杂志,2013,33(12):2973-2974.
    [4] 陆根华,牟晓峰.抗旋型股骨近端髓内钉和动力髋部螺钉治疗老年骨质疏松性股骨粗隆间骨折疗效分析[J].实用老年医学,2014,28(1):68-70.
    [5] 李意.股骨粗隆间骨折内固定手术治疗的研究进展[J].重庆医学,2013,42(10):1172.
    [6] 刘俊生,毕大卫,李强,等.体表定位Gamma 3型髓内钉内固定治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折临床疗效[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2014,29(4):328-330.
    [7] 吴维才,汤美玉,陈勇,等.Ender 氏针治疗股骨干骨折的回顾[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2009,17(24):1872-1872.
    [8] 钱忠来,徐耀增,王现彬,等.动力髋螺钉、股骨近端防旋髓内钉和第 3代Gamma钉置入内固定后生物力学性能与临床效果的比较[J].中 国组织工程研究与临床康复,2010,14(48):8974-8979.

上一篇腹腔镜直肠根治术与开腹直肠癌根治术治疗直肠癌的疗效分析

下一篇翼状胬肉切除术联合自体角膜缘干细胞移植术治疗翼状胬肉临床疗效