化学发光法与酶联免疫法应用于乙肝病毒血清学检验中的效果

雷秀丽

（岐山县中医医院检验科，陕西 宝鸡，722400）

浏览次数：79次 下载次数：538次

摘要：

目的 研究化学发光法与酶联免疫法应用于乙肝病毒血清学检验中的效果。方法 选取2016年1月至2017年1月入院就诊的86例疑似乙肝患者，所有患者均于清晨空腹采集静脉血，分离处理血清，分别选用化学发光法与酶联免疫法进行检测， 比较两种检测方法的HBsAg、HBsAb、HBeAg、HBeAb 及HBcAb 阳性率与灵敏度。结果 两种检测方法的HBcAb、HBeAg 及 HBsAb 阳性率无差异（P>0.05）；与酶联免疫法对比，化学发光法的HBsAg、HBeAb 阳性率更高（P<0.05）；酶联免疫法的检测最低浓度为0.5 ng/mL，化学发光法的检测最低浓度为0.1 ng/mL。结论 化学发光法与酶联免疫法应用于乙肝病毒血清学检验中，化学发光法的阳性率、灵敏度更高，可进一步提升乙肝确诊率，值得推广运用。

关键词：化学发光法；酶联免疫法；乙肝病毒血清学

中图分类号：R512.62文献标志码：A文章编号：2096-1413(2018)06-0100-02

Effect of chemiluminescence and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay on HBV serological test
LEI Xiu-li
(Laboratory Department, Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Qishan County, Baoji 722400, China)

ABSTRACT: Objective To study the effect of chemiluminescence and enzyme -linked immunosorbent assay on HBV serological test. Methods A total of 86 cases of suspected hepatitis B patients were admitted in our hospital from January 2016 to January 2017 were selected. All the patients collected venous blood on the early morning, serum separation to treatment, respectively using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and chemiluminescence detection. The postive rates and sensitivity of HBsAg、HBsAb、HBeAg、HBeAb and HBcAb were compared between the two methods. Results There was no difference in the positive rates of HBcAb, HBeAg and HBsAb in two detection methods (P>0.05). Compared with the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, the positive detection rate of HBsAg and HBeAb were higher in chemiluminescence (P<0.05). The minimum concentration of the detection method of enzyme-linked immunoassay was 0.5 ng/mL, and the lowest concentration of chemiluminescence detection was 0.1 ng/mL. Conclusion In the application of chemiluminescence and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in hepatitis B virus serological test, chemiluminescence has higher sensitive and positive delection rate, and can improve the diagnostic accuracy of hepatitis B, which is worthy of popularization and application.
KEYWORDS: chemiluminescence; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; hematology of hepatitis B virus

参考文献：
[1] 黄宁,张喆,马恺.电化学发光免疫法和酶联免疫法检测乙肝病毒标志物的临床对比研究[J].临床医学研究与实践,2017,2(5):132-133.
[2] 施振岗.电化学发光免疫法和酶联免疫法检测乙肝病毒标志物结果准确性的比较[J].中国当代医药,2017,24(18):111-113.
[3] 黄怿箐.化学发光免疫分析技术和酶联免疫吸附试验在乙肝病毒血清学检验中的应用分析[J].基层医学论坛,2017,21(23):3102-3103.
[4] 张英霞.乙肝病毒血清学检验采用化学发光法与酶联免疫法的效果对比[J].中外医疗,2017,36(20):35-37.
[5] 张怡莎.乙肝病毒血清学检验采用化学发光法与酶联免疫法的效果对比[J].中国卫生产业,2014,3(32):32-33.
[6] 赵晓芬.乙肝病毒血清学检验采用化学发光法与酶联免疫法的效果对比[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2016,3(4):605.
[7] 李晓茹,方萍.乙肝病毒血清学检验采用化学发光法和酶联免疫法的效果比照观察[J].世界最新医学信息文摘:电子版,2015,15(A1):178,180.
[8] 桂明,周晓霞.化学发光免疫测定在生化检验中的应用效果评价[J].中国现代医生,2016,54(5):113-115.
[9] 程育春.化学发光免疫分析技术和酶联免疫吸附试验在乙肝病毒血清学检验中的应用[J].中国实用医药,2016,11(15):53-55.
[10] 郭辉.化学发光免疫分析法与酶联免疫法测定乙肝病毒标志物的相关性分析[J].中国伤残医学,2013,21(5):270-272.
[11] 萨依拉.酶联免疫法检验乙肝病毒血清学的效果分析[J].现代医学与健康研究电子杂志,2017,1(6):58.
[12] 郭锐.化学发光法和酶联免疫法检测乙肝病毒血清学的对比[J].航空航天医学杂志,2017,28(10):1218-1219.