LEEP术和传统微波治疗妇科慢性宫颈炎的效果对比

曹虹

（榆阳区妇幼保健院，陕西 榆林，719000）

浏览次数：92次 下载次数：309次

摘要：

目的 对比LEEP 术和传统微波治疗妇科慢性宫颈炎的效果。方法 选择我院2015 年2 月至2016 年1 月收治的60 例 慢性宫颈炎患者作为研究对象，将所有患者分为对照组与观察组，每组30 例。对照组患者予以传统微波术治疗，观察组患者 予以LEEP 术治疗。观察比较两组患者治疗后的临床疗效、炎症程度及清洁度评分。结果 观察组患者治疗后的总有效率为 86.67%，高于对照组的63.33%，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。观察组患者的炎症程度、清洁度评分均低于对照组，差异有统 计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 予以慢性宫颈炎患者LEEP 术的治疗效果更为显著，可显著清除炎症，提高病变部位清洁度，进而 提高临床疗效，值得在临床中推广应用。

关键词：慢性宫颈炎；LEEP 术；传统微波术

中图分类号：R711.32文献标志码：A文章编号：2096-1413(2018)06-0080-02

Effect comparation of LEEP and traditional microwave therapy on chronic cervicitis in gynecology
CAO Hong
(Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Yuyang District, Yulin 719000, China)

ABSTRACT: Objective To compare the effect of LEEP and traditional microwave therapy on chronic cervicitis in gynecology. Methods Sixty patients with chronic cervicitis treated in our hospital from February 2015 to January 2016 were selected as the study subjects, and all patients were divided into control group and observation group, with 30 cases in each group. Patients in the control group received traditional microwave therapy, patients in the control group received LEEP. The clinical efficacy, scores of inflammation and cleanliness of the two groups were observed and compared after treatment. Results The total effective rate of the observation group after treatment was 86.67%, which was higher than 63.33% of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The scores of inflammation and cleanliness in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion LEEP treatment is more effective for patients with chronic cervicitis, which can significantly remove inflammatory lesions, improve the cleanliness, then improve the clinical curative effect. It is worth promote the clinical application.
KEYWORDS: chronic cervicitis; LEEP; traditional microwave therapy

参考文献：
[1] 任旭萍.LEEP 术治疗慢性宫颈炎的方法及疗效[J].世界最新医学信息文摘:电子版,2016,16(55):217.
[2] 刘爱琼.舒适护理在急腹症腹腔镜手术中的应用效果观察[J].基层医学论坛,2016,20(16):2309-2310.
[3] 隋冬洁.慢性宫颈炎应用LEEP 刀宫颈锥形切除术治疗的效果探讨[J].中国农村卫生,2016,9(3):48-49.
[4] 蔡瑞霞.个体化舒适护理在妇科腹腔镜手术患者中的应用效果[J].实用妇科内分泌电子杂志,2016,3(1):109-110.
[5] 王新华.LEEP 刀与微波治疗慢性宫颈炎临床对照研究[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2016,37(1):55-56.
[6] 王娅民.舒适护理在中医普外科腹腔镜手术中的干预效果[J].中国医药指南,2015,13(31):206-207.
[7] 谷保双.超高频电波刀治疗慢性宫颈炎效果探讨[J].当代医学,2015,21(29):60-61.
[8] 王志翔.LEEP 治疗慢性宫颈炎患者的护理策略[J].中国继续医学教育,2015,7(8):119-120.
[9] 刘微.80 例微波治疗慢性宫颈炎有效性分析[J].中国卫生标准管理,2015,6(7):73-74.
[10] 钟琼兰,曾艳芳,李丹,等.利普刀联合阴道镜治疗慢性宫颈炎的临床效果观察[J].现代诊断与治疗,2016,27(15):2890-2892.
[11] 金营,韩历丽.利普刀治疗慢性宫颈炎近期与远期的临床疗效[J].昆明医科大学学报,2016,37(6):73-76.
[12] 于梅.利普刀宫颈环状电切除术治疗慢性宫颈炎的临床效果观察[J].世界最新医学信息文摘:连续型电子期刊,2016,16(1):70,73.