中国学术期刊网络出版总库入编期刊
CNKI中文期刊全文数据库全文收录期刊
中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库全文收录期刊
万方数据——数字化期刊群收录期刊
中文科技期刊数据库全文收录期刊

主管:陕西省卫生健康委员会
主办:西安心身医学研究所
   西安交通大学第一附属医院
国际标准刊号:ISSN2096—1413
国内统一刊号:CN61—1503/R

子宫颈环形电切术与冷刀锥切术治疗子宫颈上皮内瘤变的对比分析

杨亚妮,刘祥芳*

(陕西省西安市鄠邑区妇幼保健院妇产科,陕西 西安,710300)

浏览次数:100次 下载次数:380次

摘要:

目的 探究子宫颈环形电切术与冷刀锥切术治疗子宫颈上皮内瘤变的临床效果。方法 选择2014 年1 月至2017 年2月我 院收治的子宫颈上皮内瘤变患者88 例,将所有患者按随机数字表法分为对照组与观察组,各44 例。对照组实施子宫颈冷刀 锥切术,观察组实施子宫颈环形电切术。对比两组手术情况、并发症总发生率、复发情况及术后6 个月HPV 转阴率。结果 观 察组患者的术中出血量少于对照组,手术时间、子宫颈愈合时间短于对照组(P<0.05)。本研究中,术后6 个月观察组HPV 转 阴率略高于对照组,复发率略低于对照组,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组并发症总发生率显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 与子宫颈冷刀锥切术相比,子宫颈环形电切术治疗子宫颈上皮内瘤变的效果更优,能减少术中出血量,缩短手术时间和宫颈愈合时间,减少并发症发生率。

关键词:子宫颈上皮内瘤变;子宫颈环形电切术;子宫颈冷刀锥切术

中图分类号:R737.33文献标志码:A文章编号:2096-1413(2018)06-0078-02

    Comparative analysis of loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
    YANG Ya-ni, LIU Xiang-fang*
    (Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Huyi District, Xi``an 710300, China)

    ABSTRACT: Objective To investigate the clinical effects of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and cold knife conization (CKC) in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Methods A total of 88 CIN patients in our hospital from January 2014 to February 2017 were selected, and divided into two groups by random number table, with 44 cases in each group. The control group was given CKC, while the observation group was given LEEP. The surgery conditions, total incidence of complication, recurrence rate and negative rate of HPV at 6 months after surgery were compared in the two groups. Results The intraoperative blood loss in the observation group was less than that of the control group, and the operation time and the healing time of the cervix were shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05) ; at 6 months after operation, the recurrence rate in the observation group was lower than that in control group, the negative rate of HPV infection in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, but there were no statistical differences (P>0.05); the total incidence of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion LEEP in the treatment of CIN is more effective than CKC, it can reduce intraoperative bleeding loss, shorten operation time and cervical healing time, reduce the incidence of complications.
    KEYWORDS: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; loop electrosurgical excision procedure; cold knife conization

    参考文献:
    [1] 李莉,赵霞,张绪婷,等.宫颈环形电切术与冷刀锥切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变的Meta 分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2017,32(10):2258-2263.
    [2] 李晓红,陈志芳,丁岩,等.宫颈环形电切术后人乳头瘤病毒持续感染的相关因素分析[J].新疆医科大学学报,2017,40(2):177-180.
    [3] 王萍,施晓飞.重组干扰素琢-2b 凝胶联合宫颈环形电切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变伴高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染的疗效[J].中国性科学,2016,25(12):62-64.
    [4] 张金荣,赵远.宫颈环形电切术与宫颈冷刀锥切术治疗高级别上皮内瘤变的临床效果及妊娠结局对比分析[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2016,24(7):472-475.
    [5] 尹醒,李书勤.宫颈环形电切术对宫颈上皮内瘤变患者妊娠及妊娠结局影响的研究[J].中国煤炭工业医学杂志,2016,19(4):552-554.
    [6] 刘宇,王颖,王沂峰.宫颈冷刀锥切术和宫腔镜下宫颈锥切术治疗高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变的疗效分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2017,33(6):434-437.
    [7] 高坤炀,刘荆银,高显舜,等.宫颈上皮内瘤变患者合并人乳头瘤病毒感染采用宫颈环形电切术治疗的动态监测分析[J].中国妇幼保 健,2016,31(11):2275-2277.
    [8] 曹庆华.宫颈环形电切术对宫颈上皮瘤变和早期宫颈癌的诊断价 值[J].安徽医药,2016,20(3):537-538.

上一篇腹腔镜联合胆道镜取石术治疗胆石症的疗效观察

下一篇LEEP术和传统微波治疗妇科慢性宫颈炎的效果对比