中国学术期刊网络出版总库入编期刊
CNKI中文期刊全文数据库全文收录期刊
中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库全文收录期刊
万方数据——数字化期刊群收录期刊
中文科技期刊数据库全文收录期刊

主管:陕西省卫生健康委员会
主办:西安心身医学研究所
   西安交通大学第一附属医院
国际标准刊号:ISSN2096—1413
国内统一刊号:CN61—1503/R

开放式胃癌根治术治疗83例胃癌患者的临床疗效分析

王天平,刘会侠

(陕西省杨凌示范区医院普外科,陕西 杨凌,712100)

浏览次数:73次 下载次数:408次

摘要:

目的 探讨开放式胃癌根治术治疗83例胃癌患者的临床效果。方法 抽选2013年1月至2016年2月在我院就诊的166例胃癌患者为研究对象,结合患者入院先后时间分为两组。观察组(83例)给予开放式胃癌根治术,对照组(83例)则结合腹腔镜治疗,对比两组患者平均手术时间、术中出血量、术后下床时间、住院时间以及术后并发症发生率等手术指标,同时统计两组患者淋巴结清扫数量差异。结果 观察组患者平均手术时间、术中出血量、术后下床时间、手术切口长度指标均低于对照组,两组数据对比,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者的住院时间、清扫淋巴结数量、术后并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 开放式胃癌根治术对治疗胃癌效果显著,手术时间及安全性有一定优势,值得在临床中推广应用。

关键词:开放式胃癌根治术;胃癌;淋巴结清扫数量

中图分类号:R735.2文献标志码:A文章编号:2096-1413(2016)27-0019-02

    Clinical efficacy of open radical gastrectomy on gastric cancer in 83 cases
    WANG Tian-ping, LIU Hui-xia
    (Department of General Surgery, the Hospital of Yangling, Yangling 712100, China)

    ABSTRACT: Objective To explore the clinical effect of open radical gastrectomy in treatment of 83 cases of patients with gastric cancer. Methods One hundred and sixty-six cases of gastric cancer patients treated in our hospital from January 2013 to February 2016 were selected as research objects, and divided into two groups according to admission time. 83 cases in the observation group underwent open radical gastrectomy, while 83 cases in the control group underwent laparoscope surgery. The average surgery time, blood loss, the incision length postoperative activity time, hospital stays, complications after surgery and the number of lymph node of the two groups were compared. Results The average operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative bed time, complication rate of the observation group were lower than those of the control group with statistically difference (P<0.05); the hospitalization time, the number of lymph nodes dissection and incidence rate of complications in the two groups had no significant difference (P >0.05). Conclusion Open radical gastrectomy for patients with gastric cancer has good efficacy, and has advantages of operation time and safety, which is worthy of clinical application.
    KEYWORDS: open radical gastrectomy; gastric cancer; number of lymph nodes dissection

    参考文献:
    [1] 董峰,牛跃平,孙培春,等.腹腔镜辅助下与开腹胃癌根治术治疗进展期远端胃癌临床对照研究[J].中华实用诊断与治疗杂志,2013,27(5):457-459.
    [2] 胡斌,邓剑,赵叶平.保留迷走神经胃癌根治术治疗42例胃癌患者临床疗效观察[J].中国社区医师,2012,14(33):151-152.
    [3] 李进权,虞黎明,赖斌,等.机器人系统及腹腔镜辅助行胃癌根治术治疗胃癌近期疗效对比Meta 分析[J].中国实用外科杂志,2014,34(12):1183-1188.
    [4] 倪开元,徐鲲杰,洪晓明.腹腔镜与开腹胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的临床对比研究[J].肿瘤学杂志,2013,19(3):235-237.
    [5] 杨永锐,王明元,戴文捷,等.腹腔镜胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的效果及对细胞免疫功能的影响[J].中外医学研究,2016,14(16):13-14.

    [6] 谢雪蒙,牟一平,严加费,等.腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术治疗胃癌的临床评价[J].全科医学临床与教育,2010,8(3):245-259.
    [7] 黄晓明,陈培浩.腹腔镜下胃癌根治术与开放性胃癌根治术的差异分析[J].临床医学工程,2016,23(4):417-418.
    [8] 赵兴.开放式胃癌根治术治疗46 例胃癌患者的临床分析[J].心理医生,2016,22(9):55-56.

上一篇埃索美拉唑与奥美拉唑治疗胃溃疡的疗效对比

下一篇醒脑静联合盐酸纳洛酮抢救脑出血伴昏迷患者的临床效果