不同通气模式用于重症肺源性心脏病呼吸衰竭患者治疗中的临床效果

张华

（解放军第三二三医院，陕西 西安，710001）

浏览次数：90次 下载次数：396次

摘要：

目的 分析不同通气模式治疗重症肺源性心脏病呼吸衰竭患者的临床效果。方法 选取我院收治的重症肺源性心脏病 呼吸衰竭患者92 例为研究对象，根据治疗方式的不同分为观察组和对照组，各46 例。观察组患者进行有创无创序贯通气治疗，对照组患者实施有创通气治疗，比较两组患者的临床效果。结果 治疗后，两组患者的临床各指标明显优于治疗前，且观察组患者各临床指标明显优于对照组患者（P<0.05）；观察组患者的并发症发生率明显低于对照组患者（P<0.05）。结论 有创无创序贯通气疗法应用于重症肺源性心脏病呼吸衰竭患者治疗中具有治疗时间短、患者机体功能恢复快、并发症少等优点，具有较高的临床应用价值。

关键词：不同通气模式；重症肺源性心脏病;呼吸衰竭

中图分类号：R541.5文献标志码：A文章编号：2096-1413(2017)08-0018-02

Clinical effects of different modes of ventilation on pulmonary heart disease patients with severe respiratory failure
ZHANG Hua
(Hospital of the PLA 323, Xi'an 710001, China)

ABSTRACT: Objective To analyze the clinical effect of different ventilation modes on pulmonary heart disease patients with severe respiratory failure. Methods Ninety -two cases of pulmonary heart disease patients with severe respiratory failure admitted in our hospital were selected, all the patients were divided into observation group and control group according to different treatment, with 46 cases in each group. The observation group received sequential invasive and noninvasive ventilation, while the control group accepted invasive ventilation. The clinical effects of two groups were compared. Results After treatment, the levels of clinical indicators of two groups were better than those before treatment, and the levels of clinical indicators of the observation group were better than those of the control group (P<0.05). The complication rate of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Sequential invasive and noninvasive ventilation on pulmonary heart disease patients with severe respiratory failure has the advantage of sh orter treatment time, quicker recovery of patients' body function and fewer complications, which has high application value.

KEYWORDS: different ventilation modes; pulmonary heart disease; severe respiratory failure

参考文献：
[1] 白红彦,杜丽惠,徐雪阳,等.无创机械通气治疗重症肺源性心脏病并发呼吸衰竭的临床价值[J].临床合理用药杂志,2014,7(28):90-91.
[2] 王晓光.无创正压通气治疗慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重并肺源性心脏病疗效观察[J].中国现代医药杂志,2015,17(4):57-59.
[3] 周松林,徐文波.无创机械通气治疗慢性肺源性心脏病合并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭的临床疗效[J].中国现代医学杂志,2015,25(12):106-109.
[4] 邹振宇.低分子肝素钙对肺源性心脏病并呼吸衰竭的临床效果分析[J].中国当代医药,2015,22(18):79-81.
[5] 朴峻.有创机械通气治疗重症肺源性心脏病并呼吸衰竭的临床观察[J].中国现代药物应用,2015,9(19):73-74.
[6] 程晓叁,余定红.不同机械通气方式在救治危重肺源性心脏病并域 型呼吸衰竭患者中的疗效观察[J].临床肺科杂志,2013,18(11):2029-2031.
[7] 彭红星,杨荣时,曾玉兰.无创双水平正压通气治疗老年慢性肺源性 心脏病合并呼吸衰竭的疗效观察[J].实用老年医学,2013,27(8):676-678.

[8] 雷应军,胡振红,刘海潮.无创正压通气对COPD合并肺源性心脏 病急性加重期患者疗效和血气、炎性指标的影响[J].疑难病杂志,2016,15(3):233-235,240.
[9] 何滨.BiPAP呼吸机无创辅助通气治疗老年慢性肺源性心脏病并发Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭临床探讨[J].中外医学研究,2016,14(2):138-139.