中国学术期刊网络出版总库入编期刊
CNKI中文期刊全文数据库全文收录期刊
中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库全文收录期刊
万方数据——数字化期刊群收录期刊
中文科技期刊数据库全文收录期刊

主管:陕西省卫生健康委员会
主办:西安心身医学研究所
   西安交通大学第一附属医院
国际标准刊号:ISSN2096—1413
国内统一刊号:CN61—1503/R

阴式与腹腔镜辅助下阴式全子宫切除术的临床效果比较

罗美英

陕西省汉中市勉县医院妇产科,陕西 汉中,724207

浏览次数:83次 下载次数:344次

摘要:

目的 探讨阴式全子宫切除术与腹腔镜辅助下阴式全子宫切除术的临床效果。方法 随机抽取 2012 年 1 月至 2017 年 1 月本院收治的择期行子宫切除术的子宫良性病变患者 60 例为研究对象,随机将其分为研究组(行腹腔镜辅助下阴式全子宫切除术)与对照组(行阴式全子宫切除术),各 30 例。对比两组患者的手术指标、并发症及术后疼痛发生情况。结果 两组患者均顺利完成手术。研究组术中出血量少于对照组,手术时间长于对照组,住院时间短于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组患者的并发症总发生率低于对照组(P<0.05),且无患者合并两种或以上并发症。研究组患者的疼痛总发生率明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 腹腔镜辅助下阴式全子宫切除术治疗子宫良性病变的效果较阴式全子宫切除术更为理想,术中出血量少,并发症及疼痛发生率低,值得深入研究和推广。

关键词:阴式全子宫切除术;腹腔镜辅助下阴式全子宫切除术;子宫良性病变

中图分类号:R713.4文献标志码:A文章编号:2096-1413(2018)08-0070-02

    Clinical effects comparison between vaginal and laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy

    LUO Mei-ying

    (Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, the Hospital of Mian County, Hanzhong 724207, China)

    ABSTRACT: Objective To explore the clinical effect of vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Methods A total of 60 patients with benign uterine lesions with hysterectomy in our hospital from January 2012 to January 2017 were randomly selected as the research objects, and randomly divided into study group (taking laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy) and control group (taking vaginal hysterectomy), with 30 cases in each group. The surgical indexes, complications and postoperative pain of the two groups were compared. Results Patients of the two groups successfully completed surgery. The intraoperative blood in the study group was less than that in the control group, the operation time was longer than that in the control group, the hospitalization time was shorter than that in the control group (P<0.05). The total incidence rate of complications in the study group was lower than that in the control group (P< 0.05), and none of the patients had two or more complications. The total incidence of pain in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy is better than vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of benign uterine lesions, with less blood loss and lower incidences of complications and pain. It is worthy of further research and promotion.           KEYWORDS: vaginal hysterectomy; laparoscopy assisted vaginal hysterectomy; benign lesion of uterus

     

    参考文献:
    [1] 王金龙,干宁,葛小花.腹腔镜辅助阴式全子宫切除术在巨大子宫肌瘤治疗中的应用价值分析[J].重庆医学,2014,43(32):4359-4360.
    [2] 张海清,李斌.腹腔镜下全子宫切除与腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除的比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2013,13(3):258-261.
    [3] 曹卉娟,邢建民,刘建平.视觉模拟评分法在症状类结局评价测量中的应用[J].中医杂志,2009,50(7):600-602.
    [4] 杨兰英.腹腔镜辅助下阴式子宫切除术与传统开腹子宫全切除临床疗效研究[J].四川医学,2015,36(3):374-376.
    [5] 周桂芝.非脱垂子宫阴式子宫全切除术、气腹腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫全切除术与开腹子宫全切除术的疗效比较[J].医学综述,2013,19 (3):575-576.
    [6] 李宁,陈宁,王燕娇.腹腔镜辅助下阴式全子宫切除术与阴式全子宫切除的疗效对比[J].中国内镜杂志,2013,19(10):1083-1086.
    [7] 黄文华.非脱垂子宫腹腔镜辅助下阴式全子宫切除术与传统腹式手术的临床比较[J].吉林医学,2017,38(6):1083-1084.
    [8] 刘彦霞.阴式全子宫切除术与腹腔镜辅助下阴式全子宫切除术的比较[J].医学综述,2013,19(24):4585-4587.

上一篇米非司酮保守治疗子宫肌瘤的临床效果

下一篇早期乳腺癌经保乳术与改良根治术治疗的效果