BPPV 患者应用BPPV诊疗系统的效果探讨
曾军燕1,张杰2,王骐1 ,张娜1,王媛1,张桂芳1 *
(1.延安大学咸阳医院神经内科,陕西 咸阳,712000;2.咸阳市中心医院神经内科,陕西 咸阳,712000)
浏览次数:95次 下载次数:270次
摘要:
目的 探讨对BPPV 患者应用BPPV 诊疗系统的效果。方法 选取2016 年7 月至2017 年6 月收治的BPPV 患者80 例为 研究对象,随机分为试验组和对照组,各40 例。试验组患者采用全自动转椅复位治疗,对照组患者采用手法复位治疗。比较 两组患者的治疗效果。结果 试验组患者治疗次日及7 d 的总有效率均明显高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P约0.05)。结论 对BPPV 患者应用BPPV 诊疗系统较手法复位治疗效果更好。
关键词:良性阵发性位置性眩晕;良性阵发性位置性眩晕诊疗系统;手法复位
中图分类号:R764文献标志码:A文章编号:2096-1413(2018)05-0011-02
Discussion on the effect of automatic BPPV diagnosis and therapy system on patients with BPPV
ZENG Jun-yan 1, ZHANG Jie 2, WANG Qi 1, ZHANG Na1, WANG Yuan 1, ZHANG Gui-fang1 *
(1. Neurology Department, Xianyang Hospital of Yan``an University, Xianyang 712000; 2. Neurology Department,
Xianyang Central Hospital, Xianyang 712000, China)
ABSTRACT: Objective To investigate the effect of automatic BPPV diagnosis and therapy system on patients with BPPV. Methods A total of 80 patients with BPPV from July 2016 to June 2017 were enrolled and selected as the research objects. All the patients were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, with 40 cases in each group. Patients in the experimental group were treated with automatic reset chair treatment, patients in the control group were treated with canalith repositioning treatment. The treatment effects were compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate at the second day and the 7 d after treatment in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusions Compared with canalith repositioning treatment, the effect of automatic BPPV diagnosis and therapy system on patients with BPPV is better.
KEYWORDS: benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV); automatic benign paroxysmal positional vertigo diagnosis and therapy system; canalith repositioning
参考文献:
[1] 王暖,耿德勤,周昊,等.SRM-郁前庭功能诊疗系统治疗良性阵发性 位置性眩晕疗效分析[J].中国临床神经科学,2016,24(6):635-640.
[2] VON BREVERN M,BERTHOLON P,BRANDT T,等.良性阵发性位 置性眩晕诊断标准[J].焉双梅,张欢,译.中国全科医学,2017,20(11):1275-1281.
[3] 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会.良性阵发性位置性眩晕的诊断依据和疗效评估(2006 年,贵阳)[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科 杂志,2007,42(3):163-164.
[4] 赵慧贤,朱丽雅,刘鑫国.后半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕的诊治 分析[J].中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2016,23(5):302-304.
[5] 单希征,马丽涛,彭新,等.良性阵发性位置性眩晕诊疗系统对良性 阵发性位置性眩晕诊疗效果的临床研究[J].中国卒中杂志,2013,8(5):340-345.
[6] 林细康,季晓林,叶华,等.良性阵发性位置性眩晕患者前庭双温交替试验的特点[J].临床神经病学杂志,2014,27(2):142-144.
[7] 何萍,徐先荣.良性阵发性位置性眩晕诊治研究进展[J].解放军医学院学报,2015,36(1):12-15.