髋关节置换术中应用全身麻醉与硬腰联合麻醉的术中及术后效果的比较

黄涛

（旬阳县医院麻醉科，陕西 安康，725700）

浏览次数：90次 下载次数：383次

摘要：

目的 探究髋关节置换术中应用全身麻醉与硬腰联合麻醉的术中及术后效果。方法 选择在我院开展髋关节置换术的患 者84 例，按照就诊先后顺序将患者分成联合组及全麻组，每组42 例，分别施行硬腰联合麻醉术及全身麻醉术，对比两组的麻 醉效果。结果 两组患者的术中出血量、输血量、输液量及手术时间比较，差异均不显著（P>0.05）；联合组恢复规律呼吸时间、术后睁眼时间、摘除喉罩时间及恢复定向力时间明显短于全麻组，躁动发生率低于全麻组，摘除喉罩即刻及5 min 后的血 压、心率、血氧饱和度均优于全麻组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05），摘除喉罩后10 min 两组血压、心率、血氧饱和度比较，差异 不显著（P>0.05）。结论 相对于仅用全身麻醉而言，硬腰联合麻醉在促进髋关节置换术后血流动力学指标恢复方面更具优势，能 够促使患者术后苏醒期情绪平稳不躁动，缩短苏醒时间，在具备手术指征的前提下可作为髋关节置换术的首选麻醉术式。

关键词：髋关节置换术；全身麻醉；硬腰联合麻醉

中图分类号：R614 文献标志码：A文章编号：2096-1413(2017)36-0060-02

Intraoperative and postoperative effects comparison between general anesthesia and hard waist combined anesthesia in the treatment of hip arthroplasty
HUANG Tao
(Anesthesiology Department, the Hospital of Xunyang County, Ankang 725700, China)

ABSTRACT: Objective To explore the intraoperative and postoperativ e effects of general anesthesia and hard waist combined anesthesia in the treatment of hip arthroplasty. Methods Eighty-four cases of patients undergoing hip arthroplasty in our hospital were enrolled, and divided into combination group and general anesthesia group according to admission order, with 42 cases in each group. The combination group was treated with hard waist combined anesthesia, and the general anesthesia group accepted general anesthesia, and the anesthetic effects between the two groups were compared. Results There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion, infusion volume and operation time between the two groups (P>0.05). The resuscitation regular respiration time, postoperative open eye time, laryngeal mask removal time and directional force recovery time in the combination group were significantly shorter than those in the general anesthesia group (P<0.05); the incidence of agitation was lower than that in the general anesthesia group (P<0.05); the blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation of the laryngeal mask removed immediately and at 5 min after laryngeal mask removal were better than those in the general anesthesia group (P <0.05), there were no significant differences in the above indexes between the two groups at 10 min after laryngeal mask removal (P>0.05). Conclusion Hard waist combined anesthesia has more advantages in the treatment of hip arthroplasty than general anesthesia, which can promote recovery of hemodynamics, promote patients to retain emotional instability restlessness after waking up, shorten the recovery time and can be used as the preferred anesthesia surgery under the premise of hip surgery.
KEYWORDS: hip arthroplasty; general anesthesia; hard waist combined anesthesia

参考文献：
[1] 秦树国,赵明,周颖.全身麻醉和腰硬联合麻醉对老年全髋关节置换 术术后麻醉恢复期的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2016,36(6):1395-1397.
[2] 安仙泉,方美丹,王聪,等.右美托咪定与咪达唑仑复合硬腰联合麻 醉对老年髋关节置换术患者早期认知功能和炎症因子的影响[J].中 国老年学杂志,2017,37(2):428-429.
[3] 曾昭池,郭中凯,朱志勇,等.微创与常规全髋关节置换术的临床疗 效比较[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2013,21(12):1173-1176.
[4] 屈惠,李卓敏,黄春,等.硬膜外麻醉及腰硬麻醉对骨水泥半髋置换 术老年患者免疫功能及激素水平的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2016,36(9):2199-2201.
[5] 徐俊峰,林梅,谢颖祥.两种不同的麻醉方式用于老年全髋关节置换 术后麻醉恢复期效果对比[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(19):5461-5463.