体外冲击波治疗骨折不愈合和延迟愈合的临床效果

陈信,杜佳泷, 尚晶晶

（陕西省安康市中医医院，陕西 安康，725000）

浏览次数：209次 下载次数：318次

摘要：

目的 探讨体外冲击波治疗骨折不愈合和延迟愈合的临床效果。方法 选取2015 年1 月至2016 年1 月我院收治的骨折 不愈合或延迟愈合患者46 例为研究对象，随机分为观察组和对照组，各23 例。对照组患者接受常规治疗，观察组患者接受 体外冲击波治疗。比较两组患者治疗前、后骨痂X 线评分、骨折愈合率及治疗费用。结果 治疗1、2、3 疗程后，两组患者的骨 痂X 线评分明显优于治疗前，且观察组患者明显优于对照组（P<0.05）。治疗后，观察组愈合率为91.30%，明显高于对照组的 78.26%（P<0.05）；观察组治疗费用明显低于对照组（P<0.05）。结论 体外冲击波治疗骨折术后不愈合或延迟愈合的临床效果 显著，值得临床推广应用。

关键词：体外冲击波；骨折不愈合；骨折延迟愈合

中图分类号：R683文献标志码：A文章编号：2096-1413(2017)35-0066-02

Clinical effect of extracorporeal shock wave on nonunion and delayed union
CHEN Xin, DU Jia-long, SHANG Jing-jing
(Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Ankang, Ankang 725000, China)

ABSTRACT: Objective To investigate the clinical effect of extracorporeal shock wave on nonunion and delayed union. Methods A total of 46 patients with nonunion and delayed union admitted in our hospital from January 2015 to January 2016 were selected and randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 23 cases in each group. The control group received routine treatment, and the observation group accepted extracorporeal shock wave. The callus X -ray score before and after treament, fracture healing rate and treatment cost were compared between the two groups. Results After 1, 2, 3 courses of treatment, the callus X-ray scores of the two groups were better than those before treatment, and those of the observation group were better than the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the fracture healing rate of the observation group was 91.30%, which was higher than 78.26% of the control group; and the treatment cost of the observation group was lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The clinical effect of extracorporeal shock wave on nonunion and delayed union is remarkable, which is worthy of clinical application and promotion.
KEYWORDS: extracorporeal shock wave; nonunion; delayed union

参考文献:
[1] 李平,刘宇强,韩树峰,等.早期体外冲击波疗法干预骨折延迟愈合不愈合的临床疗效分析[J].中国医学创新,2014,11(18):15-18.
[2] 沈保磊,刘国浚,王耀生,等.体外冲击波治疗骨不连与骨折延迟愈合的应用进展[J].中国现代药物应用,2015,9(22):273-274.
[3] 刘宇强.早期体外冲击波疗法干预骨折延迟愈合不愈合的临床疗效分析[D].太原:山西医科大学,2015.
[4] 黄晓文,韩巍,刘亚军,等.体外冲击波和传统植骨内固定治疗肥大型骨折不愈合的临床研究[J].南京医科大学学报:自然科学版,2015,35(10):1432-1436.
[5] 中华人民共和国卫生部.中药新药临床研究指导原则[S].北京:中国医药科技出版社,1993:301.
[6] 张隆浩,满立波,黄广林,等.不同剂量放散状冲击波对骨折延迟愈合或不愈合的疗效比较[J].中国康复理论与实践,2013,19(10):978-980.
[7] 陈丕峰.体外冲击波治疗骨不连及骨折延迟愈合的临床疗效观察 [D].石河子:石河子大学,2014.
[8] 华远坤,陈春冉.体外冲击波治疗骨折不愈合和延迟愈合疗效分析 [J].中国现代医生,2010,48(13):152-153.
[9] 陈丕峰,董金波.体外冲击波治疗骨不连及骨折延迟愈合的临床疗效观察[J].山东医学高等专科学校学报,2014,36(1):23-25.