中国学术期刊网络出版总库入编期刊
CNKI中文期刊全文数据库全文收录期刊
中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库全文收录期刊
万方数据——数字化期刊群收录期刊
中文科技期刊数据库全文收录期刊

主管:陕西省卫生健康委员会
主办:西安心身医学研究所
   西安交通大学第一附属医院
国际标准刊号:ISSN2096—1413
国内统一刊号:CN61—1503/R

腹腔镜联合胆道镜保胆取石术治疗胆囊结石的临床效果

庞克斌

(岐山县医院,陕西 宝鸡,722400)

浏览次数:75次 下载次数:338次

摘要:

目的 研究并分析腹腔镜联合胆道镜保胆取石术治疗胆囊结石患者的临床效果。方法 将我院收治的128 例胆囊结石 患者按照随机数字表将其分为对照组(64 例)和观察组(64 例)。对照组接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术,观察组接受腹腔镜联合胆道 镜保胆取石术。观察对比两组一期取石率、并发症发生情况、手术时间、术中出血量、肠蠕动恢复时间、饮食恢复时间以及住 院时间。结果 与对照组相比,观察组患者的一期取石率明显更高,胆汁瘘发生率及并发症总发生率明显更低(P<0.05)。与对 照组比较,观察组患者手术时间较长,术中出血量较少(P<0.05)。两组患者的肠蠕动恢复时间、饮食恢复时间及住院时间比 较,无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论 在胆囊结石患者的治疗过程中,腹腔镜联合胆道镜保胆取石术能够显著降低患者的术中出血 量,且不会延长患者术后的康复时间,还能够保留胆囊功能,值得临床推广应用。

关键词:胆囊结石;腹腔镜;胆道镜保胆取石术;联合治疗

中图分类号:R657.4文献标志码:A文章编号:2096-1413(2017)33-0097-02

    Clinical effect of laparoscopic joint choledochoscope in the treatment of gallbladder stone
    PANG Ke-bin
    (Qishan County Hospital, Baoji 722400, China)

    ABSTRACT: Objective To study and analyze the treatment effect of laparoscopic joint choledochoscope in the treatment of gallbladder stone. Methods A total of 128 cases of gallbladder stone treated in our hospital were divided into control group (64 cases) and observation group (64 cases) according to random number table. The control group received choledochoscope, while the observation group received laparoscopic joint choledochoscope. The primary stone removal rate, complications, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, recovery time of intestinal peristalsis, eating time, hospitalization in the two groups were observed and compared. Results Compared with the control group, the primary stone removal rate in the observation group was higher, and the incidence of bile leakage and total complication rate were lower (P<0.05). Compared
    with the control group, the operation time in the observation group was longer, the amount of intraoperative blood loss was fewer (P<0.05). There were no significant in the recovery time of intestinal peristalsis, eating time, hospitalization time in the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic joint choledochoscope can obviously reduce the intraoperative blood loss without prolong the postoperative recovery time, and retain gallbladder function in the treatment of gallbladder stone, which is worthy of application.
    KEYWORDS: gallbladder stones; laparoscopic; choledochoscop; combination therapy

    参考文献:
    [1] 宋正伟,杨秀江,龙昊,等.腹腔镜联合胆道镜保胆取石术与腹腔镜 胆囊切除术的临床对比分析[J].重庆医学,2014,43(6):658-660.
    [2] 葛长青,李全福,刘建辉,等.腹腔镜辅助胆道镜保胆取石术与腹腔 镜胆囊切除术的比较[J].中国内镜杂志,2012,29(2):199-202.
    [3] 程千里,周亚龙,余书勇,等.腹腔镜联合胆道镜保胆取石术治疗胆 囊结石的临床疗效[J].西南国防医药,2015,25(6):613-616.
    [4] 骆助林,田伏洲,陈理国,等.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与保胆取石术治疗 胆囊结石对比分析[J].局解手术学杂志,2012,21(6):639-641.
    [5] 杜云龙,杜福田,宿宝栋,等.腹腔镜联合胆道镜保胆取石术与腹腔 镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石疗效比较[J].潍坊医学院学报,2015,37(6):454-456.
    [6] 周筱筠,孙鑫国,谢荣俊,等.三孔法腹腔镜联合胆道镜保胆取石术 治疗胆囊结石[J].中国普通外科杂志,2013,22(8):1081-1084.

上一篇腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统开腹胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石临床疗效对比

下一篇腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗宫外孕的临床效果比较