小切口改良甲状腺切除术与传统甲状腺切除术的治疗效果比较

梁长青

（平利县中医院，陕西 安康，725500）

浏览次数：151次 下载次数：392次

摘要：

目的 比较小切口改良甲状腺切除术与传统甲状腺切除术的治疗效果。方法 将80例本院2012年5月至2015年5月收治的甲状腺瘤患者随机分为观察组与对照组，每组40例。观察组患者采用小切口改良甲状腺切除术，对照组患者采用传 统甲状腺切除术，对两组患者的治疗效果及不良事件发生情况进行比较分析。结果 观察组患者的手术耗时短于对照组，出血量少于对照组，住院时间短于对照组（P<0.05）。随访结果表明，观察组出现了1例切口感染、1例呼吸困难、2 例声音嘶哑的情况，并发症总发生率为10.0%；对照组出现了3例切口感染、2例呼吸困难、4例声音嘶哑、2 例切口粘连，并发症总发生率为27.5%；观察组患者的并发症总发生率低于对照组，差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 在治疗甲状腺瘤中，小切口改良甲状腺切除术较传统甲状腺切除术的治疗效果更佳，患者手术时间短，出血量少，住院时间短，且术后并发症发生率低，值得临床应用推广。

关键词：小切口改良甲状腺切除术；传统甲状腺切除术；甲状腺瘤

中图分类号：R736.1文献标志码：A文章编号：2096-1413(2017)29-0075-02

Effects comparison of modified small incision thyroidectomy and traditional thyroidectomy
LIANG Chang-qing
(Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Pingli County, Ankang 725500, China)

ABSTRACT: Objective To compare the effects of modified small incision thyroidectomy and traditional thyroidectomy. Methods Eighty patients with thyroid tumor in our hospital from May 2012 to May 2015 were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 40 cases in each group. The observation group was treated with modified small incision thyroidectomy, while the control group received traditional thyroidectomy. The treatment effects and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results The surgery time in the observation group was shorter than that of the control group, the amount of bleeding was less than that of the control group, hospitalization time was shorter than that of the control group (P<0.05). Follow-up results showed that there were 1 case of incisional infection, 1 case of dyspnea and 2 cases of hoarseness in the observation group, the overall complication rate was 10.0%; there were 3 cases of incision infection, 2 cases of dyspnea, 4 cases of hoarseness, 2 cases of incisional adhesions in the control group, the overall complication rate was 27.5%; the overall incidence of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Small incision modified thyroidectomy is more effective in the treatment of thyrophymain than traditional thyroidectomy, which has shorter operation time, less bleeding, shorter hospitalization time, and lower incidence of postoperative complications, and it should be used in clinical application.
KEYWORDS: small incision modified thyroidectomy; traditional thyroidectomy; thyroid tumor

参考文献：
[1] 马瑞斌,柯颖,张志刚,等.小切口改良甲状腺切除术与传统甲状腺切除术的比较研究[J].中国现代医生,2015,53(1):132-134.
[2] 何勋.小切口改良甲状腺切除术与传统甲状腺切除术的治疗效果对比[J].医学研究与教育,2015,32(3):52-55.
[3] 贺功建,李凡,任章霞,等.小切口改良甲状腺切除术与传统甲状腺切除术的临床疗效对比[J].现代生物医学进展,2016,16(14):2738-2740,2762.
[4] ZHANG Z.Efficacy comparison of the anterior low small incision and the traditional incision for treatment of thyroid adenoma[J].Pak J Med Sci, 2014,30(5):1119-1122.
[5] 陈勇,刘利敏,陈小平.超声刀小切口甲状腺切除术与传统甲状腺切除术的应用效果对比[J].实用临床医药杂志,2015,19(23):96-97.
[6] 沈江波,王建平.小切口甲状腺切除术治疗甲状腺腺瘤对前白蛋白、 视黄醇结合蛋白和C 反应蛋白的影响[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2015,17(4):296-298.
[7] 高峰,吴迟.传统甲状腺切除术与改良小切口甲状腺切除术治疗甲状腺结节的临床疗效比较[J].标记免疫分析与临床,2016,23(5):514-516,561.
[8] 张宇,杨涛,梅静,等.改良Miccoli 术式与直视下小切口行甲状腺双侧次全切除术治疗Graves 病的比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2015,15(1):26-29.
[9] 梁伟新,赖勇强,黄尚书,等.腔镜经胸乳入路与腔镜辅助颈部小切口甲状腺切除术炎性反应的对比研究[J].中国微创外科杂志,2014,14(8):707-710.
[10] 李杰清,张晓薄,牛桂芬,等.改良Miccoli 与小切口术式治疗甲状 腺腺瘤的临床对照研究[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2015,20(4):248-251.
[11] 林元沛,李艳,王楚华,等.改良小切口手术治疗甲状腺瘤的可行性 及安全性[J].临床医学工程,2016,23(3):299-300.
[12] 高峰,吴迟.传统甲状腺切除术与改良小切口甲状腺切除术治疗 甲状腺结节的临床疗效比较[J].标记免疫分析与临床,2016,23(5):514-516.