综合护理干预在急性左心衰患者急诊护理中的应用效果

白荣

（西安市灞桥区中医医院，陕西 西安，710038）

浏览次数：80次 下载次数：422次

摘要：

目的 分析急性左心衰患者急诊工作中开展综合护理干预的价值。方法 抽选2015年1月至2017年1月因急性左心衰入我院接受治疗的患者83例为研究对象，以急诊工作中不同干预模式对所有患者展开分组：将行常规干预的40例设为Ⅰ组，行综合护理干预的43 例设为Ⅱ组，比较两组患者的急诊效果、护理满意度及干预前、后心率、LVFE及FS值等。结果Ⅰ组总有效率为72.50%（29/40），低于域组的总有效率93.02%（40/43）（P<0.05）；Ⅱ组干预后护理满意度高于Ⅰ组（P<0.05）；干预后，两组心率、LVFE、FS水平均改善（P<0.05），Ⅱ组心率、LVFE、FS水平优于Ⅰ组（P<0.05）。结论 在急性左心衰急诊工作中开展综合护理干预效果显著，可行性高，推荐优先选用。

关键词：临床急诊；急性左心衰；常规干预；综合护理干预

中图分类号：R473.5文献标志码：A文章编号：2096-1413(2017)27-0179-02

Application effect of comprehensive nursing intervention in patients with acute left heart failure with emergency nursing
BAI Rong
(Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Baqiao District, Xi``an 710038, China)

ABSTRACT: Objective To analyze the value of comprehensive nursing intervention in emergency work of patients with acute left heart failure. Methods A total of 83 patients with acute left heart failure admitted in our hospital from January 2015 to January 2017 were enrolled and divided into two groups with different intervention modes in emergency work: 40 cases accepted routine intervention were classified as the group Ⅰ, and 43 cases accepted comprehensive nursing intervention were classified as the group Ⅱ. The emergency effect, nursing satisfaction and levels of heart rate, LVFE and FS before and after intervention were compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate of group Ⅰ was 72.50% (29/40), which was lower than 93.02% of the group Ⅱ (40/43) (P<0.05); the nursing satisfaction rate of group Ⅱ was higher than that of the group Ⅰ (P<0.05); after intervention, the levels of heart rate, LVFE and FS significantly improved in both groups (P<0.05), and those in the group Ⅱ significantly superior to the group Ⅰ (P<0.05). Conclusion In the acute left heart failure emergency work, comprehensive nursing intervention has remarkable effect and high feasibility, which should be recommended in priority.

KEYWORDS: clinical emergency treatment; acute left heart failure; routine intervention; comprehensive nursing intervention

参考文献：
[1] 薛丽娟,杨慧敏,王春艳,等.50 例急性左心衰患者使用多功能呼吸机无创通气和硝普钠联合治疗的护理体会[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2014,35(22):3423-3424.
[2] 吴小平,董兰菊.急性左心衰患者采用不间断性护理方式对患者病情的影响分析[J].中国医学创新,2014,7(18):111-113.
[3] 李雪梅.延续护理在腹膜透析治疗急性左心衰伴急性肾损伤患者中的应用[J].中国中西医结合肾病杂志,2015,16(2):163-164.
[4] 杨丽珍,蒲宏伟,郑瑞花,等.优化急救护理干预措施在急性左心衰患者急救中的效果[J].中国医药导报,2014,11(32):115-118.
[5] 冯惠颜,穆珍珍,尤爱燕.急性左心衰机械通气患者早期管饲护理效果观察[J].中国现代药物应用,2015,9(14):217-218.
[6] 张艳琴.开展优质护理对急性左心衰患者护理质量的影响[J].世界最新医学信息文摘:连续型电子期刊,2015,15(48):235-236.
[7] 吴晖,张丽君,李丹丹,等.循证护理在老年急性左心衰竭患者护理中的应用评价[J].检验医学与临床,2017,14(12):1817-1818.
[8] 樊芸,李桂月.院前急救护理路径在急性左心衰院前急救护理中的应用[J].世界最新医学信息文摘:连续型电子期刊,2016,16(37):207-208.