中国学术期刊网络出版总库入编期刊
CNKI中文期刊全文数据库全文收录期刊
中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库全文收录期刊
万方数据——数字化期刊群收录期刊
中文科技期刊数据库全文收录期刊

主管:陕西省卫生健康委员会
主办:西安心身医学研究所
   西安交通大学第一附属医院
国际标准刊号:ISSN2096—1413
国内统一刊号:CN61—1503/R

老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者给予TRIGEN InterTan系统与PFNA内固定术治疗的临床效果对比

刘玉春

(陕西省第四人民医院创伤关节外科,陕西 西安,710043)

浏览次数:279次 下载次数:371次

摘要:

目的 分析比较老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者给予TRIGEN InterTan 系统与股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)内固定治疗的临 床效果,以期为临床选择合理的治疗方式提供参考。方法 现选取我院自2013年1月至2015年3月收治的106例老年股骨 粗隆间骨折患者为调查对象,参照双盲随机法将患者随机划分为A组与B组,每组53例。A组患者给予TRIGEN InterTan 系统治疗,B 组患者给予PFNA 内固定术治疗,比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、骨折愈合时间,展开为期24个月的随访,以Harris 髋关节功能评分来评估患者预后。结果 两组患者骨折均愈合,未发生下肢深静脉血栓、深部感染、股骨头坏死或骨不连等并发症。B组患者的手术时间短于A组,术中出血量少于A组(P<0.05),而两组患者在住院时间、骨折愈合时间及Harris髋关节功能评分优良率比较,差异不显著(P>0.05)。结论 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者施以TRIGEN InterTan系统与PFNA内固定术治疗均具较好的效果,临床应全面评估患者的各项情况以选择合理的内固定方式。

关键词:股骨粗隆间骨折;TRIGEN InterTan 系统;股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定术

中图分类号:R687.3文献标志码:A文章编号:2096-1413(2017)27-0046-03

    Clinical effect comparison of TRIGEN InterTan system and PFNA internal fixation in elderly patients

    with intertrochanteric fracture
    LIU Yu-chun
    (Department of Traumatic Joint Surgery, the Fourth People``s Hospital of Shaanxi, Xi``an 710043, China)

    ABSTRACT: Objective To compare and analyze the clinical effect of TRIGEN InterTan system and PFNA internal fixation in the elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture, so as to provide reference for clinical treatment. Methods One hundred and six cases of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture from January 2013 to March 2015 in our hospital were selected, and divided into group A and group B with random blind method, with 53 cases in each group. The group A was treated with TRIGEN InterTan system, and the group B was treated with PFNA internal fixation. The operation time, blood loss, length of stay and fracture healing time were compared between the two groups, and 24 months follow-up was performed to assess the prognosis of the patients using the Harris hip function score. Results The fractures healed in both groups without deep vein thrombosis, deep infection, necrosis of the femoral head or nonunion. Compared with the group A, the operation time of the group B was shorter, and the blood loss was less (P<0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the length of stay, fracture healing time and Harris hip function score (P>0.05). Conclusion TRIGEN InterTan system and PFNA internal fixation in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture has better effect, so we should comprehensive assess the patients`` situation in order to choose a reasonable internal fixation in clinic.

    KEYWORDS: intertrochanteric fracture; TRIGEN InterTan system; PFNA internal fixation

    参考文献:
    [1] 马彦成,陈爱民,杨鹏.TRIGEN InterTan 系统与PFNA内固定治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折疗效分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2015,30(6):630-631.
    [2] 顾豪杰,王剑锋,凌志丹,等.DHS 与PFNA-域内固定治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折对比分析[J].浙江创伤外科杂志,2012,17(1):7-9.
    [3] MEREDDY P,KAMATH S,RAMAKRISHNAN M,et al.The AO/ASIF proximal nail antirotation (PFNA): a new design for the treatment of unstable proximal fenoral fractures[J].Injury,2009,40(4):428-432.
    [4] 何伟平,邓寿华,钟克宣,等.防旋股骨近端髓内钉治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折效果分析[J].中国当代医药,2013,20(24):187-188.
    [5] MATRE K,VINJE T,HAVELIN LI,et al.TRIGEN Inter Tan intramedullary nail versus sliding hip screw: a prospective, randomized multicenter study on pain, function, and complications in 684 patients with an intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric fracture and one year of follow-up[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2013,95(3):200-208.
    [6] 危小栋.防旋股骨近端髓内钉治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的临床观察[J].基层医学论坛,2015,19(23):3191-3192.
    [7] 汪计,金永建,王辉民,等.防旋股骨近端髓内钉内固定治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2012,21(22):2467-2468.
    [8] EREZ O,DOUGHERTY PJ.Early complications associated with cephalomedullary nail for intertrochanteric hip fractures [J].J Trauma Acute Care Surg,2012,72(2):e101-105.
    [9] LIU Y,TAO R,LIU F,et al.Mid -term outcomes after intramedullary fixation of peritrochanteric femoral fractures using the new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA)[J].Injury,2010,41(8):810-817.
    [10] 张树志,俞广,李宇俊,等.防旋股骨近端髓内钉治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的效果[J].中国医药指南,2010,8(16):83-84.
    [11] 杜星男.防旋股骨近端髓内钉与动力髋螺钉治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折疗效比较[J].亚太传统医药,2013,9(12):104-105.
    [12] 宁新创,范利中,王咏波,等.防旋股骨近端髓内钉与动力髋螺钉治疗28例老年股骨粗隆间骨折临床疗效评估[J].山西医药杂志,2013,42(3):320-322.
    [13] PENNOCK AT,SALGUEIRO L,UPASANI VV,et al.Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning versus open reduction and internal fixation for type ii lateral condyle humerus fractures in children displaced > 2 mm[J].J Pediatr Orthop,2016,36(8):780-786.
    [14] BRIN YS,PALMANOVICH E,ALIEV E,et al.Closed reduction and internal fixation for intertrochanteric femoral fractures is safer and more efficient using two fluoroscopes simultaneously [J].Injury,2014,45 (7): 1071-1075.
    [15] 孙小东,李俊豪,张帅.应用防旋股骨近端髓内钉微创治疗老年不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效观察[J].按摩与康复医学,2015,6(15):13-16.

上一篇行为治疗辅助普拉克索对早发帕金森病伴抑郁患者抑郁程度和非运动症状的影响

下一篇胸腔镜手术治疗自发性气胸的临床疗效及安全性观察