骨创伤创面软组织损伤应用负压封闭引流技术治疗的效果

薛鹏飞

（陕西省榆林市吴堡县医院外科，陕西 榆林，718299）

浏览次数：93次 下载次数：319次

摘要：

目的 探究骨创伤创面软组织损伤应用负压封闭引流技术治疗的效果。方法 选择我院骨科2011年1月至2015年12月收治的骨创伤创面软组织损伤患者200例为研究对象，所有患者随机分为试验组和对照组，各100例。对照组进行常规治疗，试验组进行负压封闭引流技术，对两组的疼痛程度、并发症发生情况、平均住院时间和平均愈合时间进行观察比较。结果 治疗后对照组疼痛评分为（4.35±0.52）分，试验组为（2.96±0.38）分，差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）；对照组并发症发 生率为10.00%，试验组发生率为4.00%，差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）；对照组平均住院时间为（23.6±8.3）d、平均愈合时间（19.6±6.8）d 长于试验组的（15.6±5.7）d 和（13.8±4.6）d（P<0.05）。结论 负压封闭引流技术可以明显减轻患者的疼痛，有效缓解患者的焦虑紧张情绪，并且可以降低并发症，改善预后，缩短住院和愈合时间，降低患者的医疗费用，具有良好的治疗效果。

关键词：骨创伤；创面软组织损伤；负压封闭引流技术

中图分类号：R473.6文献标志码：A文章编号：2096-1413(2016)26-0056-02

The effect of vacuum sealing drainage in the treatment of soft tissue injury of bone trauma
XUE Peng-fei
(Department of surgery, Wubu County Hospital, Yulin 718299, China)

ABSTRACT: Objective To investigate the effect of vacuum sealing drainage in the treatment of soft tissue injury of bone trauma. Methods Two hundred cases of patients with bone trauma wound and soft tissue injury in our hospital from January 2011 to December 2015 were selected and randomly divided into two groups, with 100 cases in each group. The control group was given routine treatment. The experimental group was given vacuum sealing drainage technique. The degree of pain, complications occurrence, average hospitalization time and the average healing time between the two groups were compared. Results After treatment, the pain score was (4.35 ±0.52) in the control group, the experimental group was (2.96±0.38), and the difference had statistical significance (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the control group was 10.00%, the incidence rate of the experimental group was 4.00%, and the difference had statistical significance (P<0.05). The average hospitalization time was (23.6±8.3) d, the average healing time was (19.6±6.8) d of the control group, which were longer than those of experimental group of (15.6±5.7) d and (13.8±4.6) d respectively (P<0.05). Conclusion Vacuum sealing drainage technology can significantly reduce the pain of patients, and effectively ease the anxiety of patients. It can reduce the complications, improve the prognosis, shorten the hospitalization and healing time, reduce the medical expenses of patients, and have good therapeutic effect.
KEYWORDS: bone trauma; soft tissue injury; vacuum sealing drainage technique

参考文献：
[1] 唐志豪.负压封闭引流技术(VSD)在治疗骨创伤创面软组织损伤中的临床疗效评价[J].中国现代医生,2014,52(5):118-119.
[2] 吴贤驹.负压封闭引流技术治疗骨创伤创面软组织损伤可行性分析[J].实用中西医结合临床,2014,14(6):51-52.
[3] 曾明亮,孙斐予,陈轶强,等.骨创伤创面软组织损伤患者应用负压封闭引流技术治疗效果观察[J].湖南师范大学学报:医学版,2015,12(6):105-108.
[4] 于文路.负压封闭引流技术(VSD)在治疗骨创伤创面软组织损伤中的临床疗效[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2015,25(A2):126-127.
[5] 刘浩,孙磊,齐岩,等.封闭负压引流修复严重软组织损伤:多种因素联合应用的评价[J].中国组织工程研究,2014,47(31):7666-7671.
[6] 杨富强,鹿松波.负压封闭引流技术联合抗生素干预跟腱术后感染的临床疗效[J].临床军医杂志,2014,9(25):912-914.
[7] 姜燕,朱小萍.VSD 负压引流技术治疗骨科创伤46例患者的体会[J].宁夏医学杂志,2014,12(12):1239-1240.