中国学术期刊网络出版总库入编期刊
CNKI中文期刊全文数据库全文收录期刊
中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库全文收录期刊
万方数据——数字化期刊群收录期刊
中文科技期刊数据库全文收录期刊

主管:陕西省卫生健康委员会
主办:西安心身医学研究所
   西安交通大学第一附属医院
国际标准刊号:ISSN2096—1413
国内统一刊号:CN61—1503/R

开腹手术与EST+LC治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石疗效分析

李晓光

(陕西省宝鸡市岐山县医院,陕西 宝鸡,722400)

浏览次数:142次 下载次数:333次

摘要:

目的 分析开腹手术与EST+LC治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效。方法 选取我院2014年5月至2016年5月收治的胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者80例,随机分为开腹组(n=40)和微创组(n=40),开腹组患者采用开腹胆囊切除、胆总管切开取石、T管引流治疗,微创组患者采用EST+LC治疗,对两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、肠鸣音恢复时间、肛门排气时间、住院时间、住院费用、手术成功情况、术后镇痛药使用情况及并发症发生情况进行统计分析。结果 治疗后,微创组患者的术中出血量显著少于开腹组,肠鸣音恢复时间、肛门排气时间、住院时间均显著短于开腹组,住院费用显著低于开腹组,术后镇痛药使用率、并发症发生率显著低于开腹组,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 EST+LC治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石疗效较开腹胆囊切除、胆总管切开取石、T 管引流好。

关键词:开腹胆囊切除;T 管引流;EST+LC;胆囊结石合并胆总管结石

中图分类号:R657.4文献标志码:A文章编号:2096-1413(2017)08-0073-02

    Efficacy analysis of open surgury and EST + LC in the treatment of gallbladder and common bile duct stones
    LI Xiao-guang
    (Qishan County Hospital of Baoji, Baoji 722400, China)

    ABSTRACT: Objective To analyze the efficacy of open surgury and EST+LC in the treatment of gallbladder and common bile duct stones. Methods Eighty cases of patients with gallbladder and common bile duct stones who were treated in our hospital from May 2014 to May 2016 were selected and randomly divided into laparotomy group (n =40) and minimally invasive group (n=40). The laparotomy group was given cholecystectomy, common bile duct exploration, T tube drainage treatment, while the minimally invasive group was given EST+LC treatment. The operative time, blood loss, recovery time of bowel sounds, flatus time, hospital stay, hospital costs, the operation successful, postoperative analgesic use conditions and complications of the two groups were statistically analyzed. Results The blood loss of the minimally invasive group were significantly less than that of the laparotomy group; the recovery time of bowel sounds, flatus time, hospital stay of the minimally invasive group was significantly shorter than those of the laparotomy group. The hospitalization costs and postoperative analgesic usage of the minimally invasive group were lower than those of the laparotomy group; the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The efficacy of EST+LC in the treatment of gallbladder is
    better than than cholecystectomy, common bile duct stones and T tube drainage .
    KEYWORDS: cholecystectomy; T tube drainage; EST+LC; gallbladder and common bile duct stones

    参考文献:
    [1] 黄小龙,韩霖,翁杰,等.ERCP联合LC治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结 石34例临床分析[J].海南医学,2011,22(4):70-72.
    [2] 邹浩,朱红,张小文,等.胆囊结石合并胆总管结石微创治疗方式的选择[J].广东医学,2011,32(10):1319-1321.
    [3] 马振,宿华威.微创时代胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的外科治疗[J]. 中国误诊学杂志,2011,11(36):8838-8840.
    [4] 黄韬,陆立平,陆品相.内镜胆道取石后LC手术时机探讨[J].肝胆 胰外科杂志,2010,22(1):52-54.
    [5] 亚力坤,刘晖,斯坎德尔,等.胆总管切开取石一期缝合与“T”管引流 的对比研究[J].肝胆外科杂志,2011,19(4):290-292.
    [6] 杨玉龙,冯秋实,张宝善.胆道内镜微创治疗肝内外胆管结石的几点思考[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2011,23(1):80-83.
    [7] 张日新,郑直,何涛,等.腹腔镜胆总管探查取石术后胆管一期缝合与T管引流比较的系统评价[J].中国循证医学杂志,2011,11(10):1161-1165.
    [8] 刘岳松,李明宏,王建华.腹腔镜及内镜治疗胆总管结石(附41例报 道)[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2011,18(4):430-431.

上一篇老年肱骨外科颈骨折的临床特征与切开复位内固定术治疗研究

下一篇LEEP 术和子宫全切术治疗宫颈高级别上皮内瘤变的效果比较