常规雾化吸入和电动雾化泵雾化吸入对小儿哮喘的治疗效果分析

高金红

（陕西省三原县医院，陕西 咸阳，713800）

浏览次数：106次 下载次数：280次

摘要：

目的 评价不同雾化吸入方法治疗小儿哮喘的效果。方法 选择我院在2013年8月至2016年1月收治的110例小儿哮喘患儿作为研究对象，将所有患儿按照随机方法分为观察组和对照组，每组55 例。对照组患儿以常规的雾化吸入方法进行治疗，观察组患儿采用氧驱动雾化方式进行治疗，对两组患儿的治疗效果进行比较。结果 观察组患儿的治疗总有效率明显高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。治疗前，两组患儿PaO₂ 和FVC比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；治疗后，两组患 儿PaO₂ 和FVC均有改善，且观察组改善更为明显，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。观察组患儿不良反应发生率明显低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 对小儿哮喘采用氧驱动雾化方式进行治疗，能够有效提高患儿治疗的总有效率，值得在临床上推广使用。

关键词：雾化吸入；氧驱动雾化吸入；小儿哮喘

中图分类号：R725.6文献标志码：A文章编号：2096-1413(2017)15-0084-02

Effect evaluation of conventional atomizing inhalation and electric atomizing pump atomizing inhalation in

the treatment of children with asthma
GAO Jin-hong
(Sanyuan County Hospital of Shaanxi Province, Xianyang 713800, China)

ABSTRACT: Objective To evaluate the effect of different atomizing inhalation methods in the treatment of infantile asthma. Methods One hundred and ten cases of children with asthma in our hospital from August 2013 to January 2016 were selected as the study subjects, and they were divided into observation group and control group according to the random method, with 55 cases in each group. The control group received conventional atomizing inhalation, and the observation group received the oxygen-driven atomization, then the effects of the two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Before treatment, the PaO₂ and FVC in the two groups were not significantly different (P>0.05); after treatment, PaO₂ and FVC improved in the two groups, but the improvement was more obvious in the observation group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence rate of adverse reactions in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The use of oxygen -driven atomization in children with asthma for atomization treatment can effectively improve the efficiency of treatment, which is worth of promotion in clinic.
KEYWORDS: atomizing inhalation; oxygen-driven atomization inhalation; pediatric asthma

参考文献：
[1] 鞠艳涛.雾化吸入联合孟鲁斯特治疗小儿感染后咳嗽的疗效分析 [J].中国医药指南,2016,14(20):150.
[2] 邱学荣.重组人干扰素α-1b雾化治疗小儿毛细支气管炎的疗效观察[J].海峡药学,2016,28(7):195-196.
[3] 付娜.不同雾化吸入方式治疗小儿哮喘的疗效评价[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2016,3(16):3167-3168.
[4] 牛丽英.探讨不同布地奈德雾化吸入剂量在小儿毛细支气管炎治疗中的疗效[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2016,3(17):3473.
[5] 盛海英,李建国.雾化吸入干扰素α-2b(假单胞菌)治疗儿童病毒性呼吸道感染的临床观察[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2016,3(21):4301.


[6] 李清民.布地奈德联合干扰素雾化吸入治疗小儿毛细支气管炎的疗效观察[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2016,3(22):4346-4347.
[7] 张世玲.阿奇霉素联合沐舒坦雾化吸入治疗小儿支原体肺炎的疗效及安全性[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2016,3(24):4906.
[8] 林海庆,江浩,李谷风,等.家庭雾化吸入治疗在哮喘预测指数阳性患儿急性发作中的应用研究[J].临床肺科杂志,2016,21(8):1378-1380.


[9] 铁守刚.布地奈德雾化吸入治疗小儿毛细支气管炎效果观察[J].临床合理用药杂志,2016,9(23):57-58.
[10] 蔡祥城,林雪娟.盐酸氨溴索注射液雾化吸入治疗慢性支气管炎急性发作50例疗效观察[J].当代医学,2014,20(5):148-149.